Most Helpful Customer Reviews: Add Your Own Review |
Use only with another resource, October 03, 1999
By A customer
|
|
It's is very obvious that the editors either completely ignored their job or have no idea that the DAT is completely computerized. It gives good tips on how to study and what not, but DON'T count on this book to help you do well. There are much better reviews out there. The sample tests are the best part. Other than that itn was a an okay book. Not to be used as the primary study tool.
4 of 4 people found the above review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
"A confusing, inaccurate depiction of the DAT...", May 24, 1999
By A customer
|
|
This book failed to prepare my students for the DAT and I highly reccomend purchasing another book. This book was inaccurate, ambiguous, which proved to me the author had no experience with the DAT or undergraduate course preparation. A travesty to the reputation of proper DAT preparation...
1 of 1 people found the above review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
It was average., April 10, 1999
By Nathan Klein (nathanbradin@cctr.umkc.edu (Kansas City, Missouri)
|
|
It was far from spectacular. I found several errors and informed the editors. They will be corrected in the 2000 edition. I found that it did not give any insight in to the computerized DAT. In fact it gaves ways to study for just the written. This may be because it has not had many updates since late 80's. That bothers me! I have an 94' edition identical to my 99'. Not very many questions, more of a get you in the mood to study.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|