Most Helpful Customer Reviews:
Add Your Own Review |
 Nice but lots of writing, December 19, 2012
By Geoffrey R Clive
|
|
I got the hardcover edition. It was really cheap and it had writing in it. But it presents great information and I have enjoyed it so far.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Very well written, December 21, 2010
By touskin (Baltimore, MD USA)
|
|
I will recommend the book, but i would have loved if the CD was more useful but its really not in my opinion. They need to make it downloadable online as well.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
 book review, September 17, 2009
By Nurhayu Ab Rahman (crawley, WA AUS)
|
|
An excellent book. A must for clinician's specializing in oral medicine and oral pathology. Most updated text and most imporatant..it make sense! and this helps me understand better.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Oral Path Review, December 21, 2008
By ep (Maryland)
|
|
Great general oral path book. CD that comes with is good to test your knowledge through case studies.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
Excellent Clinical Reference, January 03, 2008
By Christie Williams (Towson, MD United States)
|
|
As a busy clinical otolaryngologist in Lutherville Maryland, who is called upon to render opinions on all manner of oral lesions, I am pleased to finally have a comprehensive reference to make my practice more precise and treatment rendered more effective. This book is very well illustrated and provides an in-depth yet telegraphic approach to the wide range of oral pathology that is encountered in the general clinical practice of ENT. I recommend this well referenced book to all of us in allopathic medicine, who are not extensively trained in benign oral lesions,but are in need of a cogent answer to the question "Hey Doc look at this and tell me what you think it is?". I now have a "go to" reference for this exact need. Mark Williams MD
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
excellent text, February 18, 1999
By A customer
|
|
less comprehensive than Shafer's but it is more direct to the target and more actually clinically oriented. thanks to the authors
2 of 2 people found the above review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
See all 10 Reviews.
|
(
